ThreatLocker vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection (2026)
Our verdict
ThreatLocker vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.8/10). ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing; Webroot Business Endpoint Protection starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints. Choose ThreatLocker for the stronger overall track record; consider Webroot Business Endpoint Protection if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
| ThreatLocker | Webroot Business Endpoint Protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | quote | per endpoint |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | 30 days |
| Best for | MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing | MSPs wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 (250) | 4.6/5 (500) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.7/10 | 7.8/10 |
ThreatLocker
Pros
- Powerful Zero Trust controls
- Excellent support
- Strong MSP fit
Cons
- Allowlisting requires ongoing tuning
- Quote pricing
- Different model than AV/EDR
Affiliate link: ThreatLocker may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
Pros
- Extremely lightweight
- Fast scans
- MSP-friendly
Cons
- Lighter EDR depth
- Detection trails leaders in tests
- Quote pricing
Visit Webroot Business Endpoint Protection →
Affiliate link: Webroot Business Endpoint Protection may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Choose ThreatLocker if…
You need msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing. See the ThreatLocker pricing and review.
Choose Webroot Business Endpoint Protection if…
You need msps wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints. See the Webroot Business Endpoint Protection pricing and review.
In depth
Pricing: ThreatLocker vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
ThreatLocker bills on a quote model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while Webroot Business Endpoint Protection uses a per endpoint model from Custom quote (30 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
ThreatLocker ships 5 headline capabilities (Application allowlisting, Ringfencing, Storage control, Elevation control) and deploys Cloud. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection ships 4 (Tiny fast agent, Cloud management, Journaling/rollback, DNS protection option), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
ThreatLocker holds 4.8/5 (250 G2 reviews); Webroot Business Endpoint Protection holds 4.6/5 (500 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.8/10). Pick Webroot Business Endpoint Protection instead when msps wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints. See ThreatLocker alternatives or Webroot Business Endpoint Protection alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- ThreatLocker vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection: which is better?
- ThreatLocker vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 7.8/10). ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing; Webroot Business Endpoint Protection starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting an ultra-light cloud agent for many endpoints.
- Is ThreatLocker cheaper than Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?
- ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and Webroot Business Endpoint Protection starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).