Malwarebytes ThreatDown vs ThreatLocker (2026)
Our verdict
Malwarebytes ThreatDown vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 8.1/10). Malwarebytes ThreatDown starts at $69/endpoint/yr and is best for smbs/msps wanting simple, effective edr with optional mdr; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing. Choose ThreatLocker for the stronger overall track record; consider Malwarebytes ThreatDown if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
| Malwarebytes ThreatDown | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $69/endpoint/yr | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per endpoint | quote |
| Free trial / tier | yes | 30 days |
| Best for | SMBs/MSPs wanting simple, effective EDR with optional MDR | MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (900) | 4.8/5 (250) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.1/10 | 8.7/10 |
Malwarebytes ThreatDown
Pros
- Easy to deploy and use
- Great remediation heritage
- Transparent entry price
Cons
- Advanced features need higher tiers
- Reporting basic
- Newer to EDR
Visit Malwarebytes ThreatDown →
Affiliate link: Malwarebytes ThreatDown may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
ThreatLocker
Pros
- Powerful Zero Trust controls
- Excellent support
- Strong MSP fit
Cons
- Allowlisting requires ongoing tuning
- Quote pricing
- Different model than AV/EDR
Affiliate link: ThreatLocker may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Choose Malwarebytes ThreatDown if…
You need smbs/msps wanting simple, effective edr with optional mdr. See the Malwarebytes ThreatDown pricing and review.
Choose ThreatLocker if…
You need msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing. See the ThreatLocker pricing and review.
In depth
Pricing: ThreatLocker vs Malwarebytes ThreatDown
ThreatLocker bills on a quote model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while Malwarebytes ThreatDown uses a per endpoint model from $69/endpoint/yr (yes trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
ThreatLocker ships 5 headline capabilities (Application allowlisting, Ringfencing, Storage control, Elevation control) and deploys Cloud. Malwarebytes ThreatDown ships 5 (Strong remediation engine, EDR + ransomware rollback, Simple console, Optional MDR), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
ThreatLocker holds 4.8/5 (250 G2 reviews); Malwarebytes ThreatDown holds 4.6/5 (900 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 8.1/10). Pick Malwarebytes ThreatDown instead when smbs/msps wanting simple, effective edr with optional mdr. See ThreatLocker alternatives or Malwarebytes ThreatDown alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Malwarebytes ThreatDown vs ThreatLocker: which is better?
- Malwarebytes ThreatDown vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 8.1/10). Malwarebytes ThreatDown starts at $69/endpoint/yr and is best for smbs/msps wanting simple, effective edr with optional mdr; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing.
- Is Malwarebytes ThreatDown cheaper than ThreatLocker?
- Malwarebytes ThreatDown starts at $69/endpoint/yr and ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).