Huntress vs Todyl (2026)

Our verdict

Huntress vs Todyl: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (9.2 vs 8.4/10). Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc; Todyl starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr). Choose Huntress for the stronger overall track record; consider Todyl if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.

Huntress vs Todyl — head-to-head
HuntressTodyl
Starting price Custom quote Custom quote
Pricing model per endpoint quote
Free trial / tier yes
Best for MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC MSPs wanting a modular security platform (SASE + EDR + MDR)
Deployment Cloud Cloud
G2 rating 4.9/5 (700) 4.8/5 (60)
Capterra rating
Our score 9.2/10 8.4/10

Huntress

Pros

  • Outstanding SOC + support
  • Built for MSPs/SMB
  • Fast time-to-value

Cons

  • Quote pricing
  • Complements (not replaces) some AV
  • Endpoint-count based

Visit Huntress →

Affiliate link: Huntress may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.

Todyl

Pros

  • Consolidates many tools in one agent
  • MSP-focused
  • Flexible modules

Cons

  • Quote pricing
  • Breadth = learning curve
  • Younger platform

Visit Todyl →

Affiliate link: Todyl may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.

Choose Huntress if…

You need msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc. See the Huntress pricing and review.

Choose Todyl if…

You need msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr). See the Todyl pricing and review.

In depth

Pricing: Huntress vs Todyl

Huntress bills on a per endpoint model from Custom quote (yes trial), while Todyl uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.

Features & deployment

Huntress ships 5 headline capabilities (Managed EDR with 24/7 SOC, Microsoft 365 ITDR, Security awareness training, Ransomware canaries) and deploys Cloud. Todyl ships 5 (Single-agent platform, SASE/SSE networking, EDR + MXDR, SIEM), deploying Cloud.

Ratings & verdict

Huntress holds 4.9/5 (700 G2 reviews); Todyl holds 4.8/5 (60 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Huntress edges ahead (9.2 vs 8.4/10). Pick Todyl instead when msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr). See Huntress alternatives or Todyl alternatives.

Frequently asked questions

Huntress vs Todyl: which is better?
Huntress vs Todyl: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (9.2 vs 8.4/10). Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc; Todyl starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting a modular security platform (sase + edr + mdr).
Is Huntress cheaper than Todyl?
Huntress starts at Custom quote and Todyl starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: huntress.com, todyl.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.