ESET PROTECT vs ThreatLocker (2026)
Our verdict
ESET PROTECT vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 8.3/10). ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing. Choose ThreatLocker for the stronger overall track record; consider ESET PROTECT if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
| ESET PROTECT | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per device | quote |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | 30 days |
| Best for | Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection | MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (800) | 4.8/5 (250) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.3/10 | 8.7/10 |
ESET PROTECT
Pros
- Very light agent
- Reliable detection
- Flexible deployment
Cons
- EDR is higher tier
- Quote pricing
- Smaller US channel
Affiliate link: ESET PROTECT may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
ThreatLocker
Pros
- Powerful Zero Trust controls
- Excellent support
- Strong MSP fit
Cons
- Allowlisting requires ongoing tuning
- Quote pricing
- Different model than AV/EDR
Affiliate link: ThreatLocker may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Choose ESET PROTECT if…
You need teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection. See the ESET PROTECT pricing and review.
Choose ThreatLocker if…
You need msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing. See the ThreatLocker pricing and review.
In depth
Pricing: ThreatLocker vs ESET PROTECT
ThreatLocker bills on a quote model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while ESET PROTECT uses a per device model from Custom quote (30 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
ThreatLocker ships 5 headline capabilities (Application allowlisting, Ringfencing, Storage control, Elevation control) and deploys Cloud. ESET PROTECT ships 5 (Lightweight AV, EDR (Inspect), Full-disk encryption, Cloud console), deploying Cloud + on-prem.
Ratings & verdict
ThreatLocker holds 4.8/5 (250 G2 reviews); ESET PROTECT holds 4.6/5 (800 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 8.3/10). Pick ESET PROTECT instead when teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection. See ThreatLocker alternatives or ESET PROTECT alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- ESET PROTECT vs ThreatLocker: which is better?
- ESET PROTECT vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 8.3/10). ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing.
- Is ESET PROTECT cheaper than ThreatLocker?
- ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).