Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT (2026)

Our verdict

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: on our data-weighted scoring, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (8.3 vs 7.9/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr; ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection. Choose ESET PROTECT for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Secure Endpoint if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT — head-to-head
Cisco Secure EndpointESET PROTECT
Starting price Custom quote Custom quote
Pricing model quote per device
Free trial / tier yes 30 days
Best for Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR Teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection
Deployment Cloud Cloud + on-prem
G2 rating 4.4/5 (150) 4.6/5 (800)
Capterra rating
Our score 7.9/10 8.3/10

Cisco Secure Endpoint

Pros

  • Talos threat intelligence
  • Integrates with Cisco stack
  • Solid detection

Cons

  • Best within Cisco ecosystem
  • Quote pricing
  • Heavier admin

Visit Cisco Secure Endpoint →

Affiliate link: Cisco Secure Endpoint may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.

ESET PROTECT

Pros

  • Very light agent
  • Reliable detection
  • Flexible deployment

Cons

  • EDR is higher tier
  • Quote pricing
  • Smaller US channel

Visit ESET PROTECT →

Affiliate link: ESET PROTECT may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.

Choose Cisco Secure Endpoint if…

You need cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr. See the Cisco Secure Endpoint pricing and review.

Choose ESET PROTECT if…

You need teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection. See the ESET PROTECT pricing and review.

In depth

Pricing: ESET PROTECT vs Cisco Secure Endpoint

ESET PROTECT bills on a per device model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while Cisco Secure Endpoint uses a quote model from Custom quote (yes trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.

Features & deployment

ESET PROTECT ships 5 headline capabilities (Lightweight AV, EDR (Inspect), Full-disk encryption, Cloud console) and deploys Cloud + on-prem. Cisco Secure Endpoint ships 4 (EDR with Talos intel, SecureX/XDR integration, Threat hunting, Sandboxing), deploying Cloud.

Ratings & verdict

ESET PROTECT holds 4.6/5 (800 G2 reviews); Cisco Secure Endpoint holds 4.4/5 (150 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (8.3 vs 7.9/10). Pick Cisco Secure Endpoint instead when cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr. See ESET PROTECT alternatives or Cisco Secure Endpoint alternatives.

Frequently asked questions

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: which is better?
Cisco Secure Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT: on our data-weighted scoring, ESET PROTECT edges ahead (8.3 vs 7.9/10). Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr; ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote and is best for teams wanting lightweight, reliable endpoint protection.
Is Cisco Secure Endpoint cheaper than ESET PROTECT?
Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and ESET PROTECT starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: cisco.com, eset.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.