Bitdefender GravityZone vs ThreatLocker (2026)
Our verdict
Bitdefender GravityZone vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 8.6/10). Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and is best for smbs and msps wanting strong protection at a fair price; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing. Choose ThreatLocker for the stronger overall track record; consider Bitdefender GravityZone if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
| Bitdefender GravityZone | ThreatLocker | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per device | quote |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | 30 days |
| Best for | SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price | MSPs wanting Zero Trust allowlisting and ringfencing |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (400) | 4.8/5 (250) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.6/10 | 8.7/10 |
Bitdefender GravityZone
Pros
- Excellent independent AV test scores
- Affordable
- Good MSP program
Cons
- EDR is a higher tier
- Console can feel dense
- Per-device tiers
Visit Bitdefender GravityZone →
Affiliate link: Bitdefender GravityZone may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
ThreatLocker
Pros
- Powerful Zero Trust controls
- Excellent support
- Strong MSP fit
Cons
- Allowlisting requires ongoing tuning
- Quote pricing
- Different model than AV/EDR
Affiliate link: ThreatLocker may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Choose Bitdefender GravityZone if…
You need smbs and msps wanting strong protection at a fair price. See the Bitdefender GravityZone pricing and review.
Choose ThreatLocker if…
You need msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing. See the ThreatLocker pricing and review.
In depth
Pricing: ThreatLocker vs Bitdefender GravityZone
ThreatLocker bills on a quote model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while Bitdefender GravityZone uses a per device model from Custom quote (30 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
ThreatLocker ships 5 headline capabilities (Application allowlisting, Ringfencing, Storage control, Elevation control) and deploys Cloud. Bitdefender GravityZone ships 5 (Top-rated AV engine, EDR/XDR options, Risk analytics, Patch + full-disk encryption add-ons), deploying Cloud + on-prem.
Ratings & verdict
ThreatLocker holds 4.8/5 (250 G2 reviews); Bitdefender GravityZone holds 4.6/5 (400 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 8.6/10). Pick Bitdefender GravityZone instead when smbs and msps wanting strong protection at a fair price. See ThreatLocker alternatives or Bitdefender GravityZone alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Bitdefender GravityZone vs ThreatLocker: which is better?
- Bitdefender GravityZone vs ThreatLocker: on our data-weighted scoring, ThreatLocker edges ahead (8.7 vs 8.6/10). Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and is best for smbs and msps wanting strong protection at a fair price; ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote and is best for msps wanting zero trust allowlisting and ringfencing.
- Is Bitdefender GravityZone cheaper than ThreatLocker?
- Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and ThreatLocker starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).