Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cisco Secure Endpoint (2026)
Our verdict
Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cisco Secure Endpoint: on our data-weighted scoring, Bitdefender GravityZone edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.9/10). Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and is best for smbs and msps wanting strong protection at a fair price; Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr. Choose Bitdefender GravityZone for the stronger overall track record; consider Cisco Secure Endpoint if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.
| Bitdefender GravityZone | Cisco Secure Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Custom quote | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | per device | quote |
| Free trial / tier | 30 days | yes |
| Best for | SMBs and MSPs wanting strong protection at a fair price | Cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated EDR |
| Deployment | Cloud + on-prem | Cloud |
| G2 rating | 4.6/5 (400) | 4.4/5 (150) |
| Capterra rating | — | — |
| Our score | 8.6/10 | 7.9/10 |
Bitdefender GravityZone
Pros
- Excellent independent AV test scores
- Affordable
- Good MSP program
Cons
- EDR is a higher tier
- Console can feel dense
- Per-device tiers
Visit Bitdefender GravityZone →
Affiliate link: Bitdefender GravityZone may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Cisco Secure Endpoint
Pros
- Talos threat intelligence
- Integrates with Cisco stack
- Solid detection
Cons
- Best within Cisco ecosystem
- Quote pricing
- Heavier admin
Affiliate link: Cisco Secure Endpoint may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.
Choose Bitdefender GravityZone if…
You need smbs and msps wanting strong protection at a fair price. See the Bitdefender GravityZone pricing and review.
Choose Cisco Secure Endpoint if…
You need cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr. See the Cisco Secure Endpoint pricing and review.
In depth
Pricing: Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cisco Secure Endpoint
Bitdefender GravityZone bills on a per device model from Custom quote (30 days trial), while Cisco Secure Endpoint uses a quote model from Custom quote (yes trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.
Features & deployment
Bitdefender GravityZone ships 5 headline capabilities (Top-rated AV engine, EDR/XDR options, Risk analytics, Patch + full-disk encryption add-ons) and deploys Cloud + on-prem. Cisco Secure Endpoint ships 4 (EDR with Talos intel, SecureX/XDR integration, Threat hunting, Sandboxing), deploying Cloud.
Ratings & verdict
Bitdefender GravityZone holds 4.6/5 (400 G2 reviews); Cisco Secure Endpoint holds 4.4/5 (150 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Bitdefender GravityZone edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.9/10). Pick Cisco Secure Endpoint instead when cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr. See Bitdefender GravityZone alternatives or Cisco Secure Endpoint alternatives.
Frequently asked questions
- Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cisco Secure Endpoint: which is better?
- Bitdefender GravityZone vs Cisco Secure Endpoint: on our data-weighted scoring, Bitdefender GravityZone edges ahead (8.6 vs 7.9/10). Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and is best for smbs and msps wanting strong protection at a fair price; Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote and is best for cisco-centric enterprises wanting integrated edr.
- Is Bitdefender GravityZone cheaper than Cisco Secure Endpoint?
- Bitdefender GravityZone starts at Custom quote and Cisco Secure Endpoint starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).