Automox vs NinjaOne (2026)

Our verdict

Automox vs NinjaOne: on our data-weighted scoring, NinjaOne edges ahead (9.1 vs 8.3/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams; NinjaOne starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm. Choose NinjaOne for the stronger overall track record; consider Automox if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.

Automox vs NinjaOne — head-to-head
AutomoxNinjaOne
Starting price $3/endpoint/mo Custom quote
Pricing model per endpoint per device
Free trial / tier 14 days 14 days
Best for Cloud-native cross-OS patch + config automation for lean IT teams MSPs and IT teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one RMM
Deployment Cloud Cloud
G2 rating 4.5/5 (90) 4.7/5 (1600)
Capterra rating 4.8/5 (230)
Our score 8.3/10 9.1/10

Automox

Pros

  • True cross-OS parity
  • No on-prem infrastructure
  • Flexible automation via Worklets

Cons

  • No free tier
  • Per-endpoint cost adds up
  • Reporting depth trails enterprise suites

Visit Automox →

Affiliate link: Automox may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.

NinjaOne

Pros

  • Modern fast UI
  • Excellent patching built in
  • Top-rated support

Cons

  • No public pricing (quote only)
  • Per-device cost
  • Some advanced features cost extra

Visit NinjaOne →

Affiliate link: NinjaOne may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.

Choose Automox if…

You need cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams. See the Automox pricing and review.

Choose NinjaOne if…

You need msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm. See the NinjaOne pricing and review.

In depth

Pricing: NinjaOne vs Automox

NinjaOne bills on a per device model from Custom quote (14 days trial), while Automox uses a per endpoint model from $3/endpoint/mo (14 days trial). Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.

Features & deployment

NinjaOne ships 6 headline capabilities (RMM + patch management, Endpoint backup, Remote access, Software deployment) and deploys Cloud. Automox ships 5 (Cross-platform patching (Windows/macOS/Linux), Third-party app patching, Worklets automation, Cloud-native (no VPN/agents infra)), deploying Cloud.

Ratings & verdict

NinjaOne holds 4.7/5 (1600 G2 reviews); Automox holds 4.5/5 (90 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, NinjaOne edges ahead (9.1 vs 8.3/10). Pick Automox instead when cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams. See NinjaOne alternatives or Automox alternatives.

Frequently asked questions

Automox vs NinjaOne: which is better?
Automox vs NinjaOne: on our data-weighted scoring, NinjaOne edges ahead (9.1 vs 8.3/10). Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and is best for cloud-native cross-os patch + config automation for lean it teams; NinjaOne starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and it teams wanting a modern, fast, all-in-one rmm.
Is Automox cheaper than NinjaOne?
Automox starts at $3/endpoint/mo and NinjaOne starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: automox.com, ninjaone.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.