Arctic Wolf vs Huntress (2026)

Our verdict

Arctic Wolf vs Huntress: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (9.2 vs 8.5/10). Arctic Wolf starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team; Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc. Choose Huntress for the stronger overall track record; consider Arctic Wolf if its pricing model or fit matches your environment better. Side-by-side table below.

Arctic Wolf vs Huntress — head-to-head
Arctic WolfHuntress
Starting price Custom quote Custom quote
Pricing model quote per endpoint
Free trial / tier yes
Best for Mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team MSPs and SMBs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human SOC
Deployment Cloud Cloud
G2 rating 4.7/5 (250) 4.9/5 (700)
Capterra rating
Our score 8.5/10 9.2/10

Arctic Wolf

Pros

  • Dedicated concierge team
  • Broad telemetry
  • Strong outcomes

Cons

  • Higher cost
  • Quote/contract
  • Less DIY control

Visit Arctic Wolf →

Affiliate link: Arctic Wolf may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.

Huntress

Pros

  • Outstanding SOC + support
  • Built for MSPs/SMB
  • Fast time-to-value

Cons

  • Quote pricing
  • Complements (not replaces) some AV
  • Endpoint-count based

Visit Huntress →

Affiliate link: Huntress may pay us a commission if you sign up through this link. It never affects our data-driven ranking.

Choose Arctic Wolf if…

You need mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team. See the Arctic Wolf pricing and review.

Choose Huntress if…

You need msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc. See the Huntress pricing and review.

In depth

Pricing: Huntress vs Arctic Wolf

Huntress bills on a per endpoint model from Custom quote (yes trial), while Arctic Wolf uses a quote model from Custom quote. Because the models differ, the cheaper option flips depending on your fleet size — model both at your seat/endpoint count.

Features & deployment

Huntress ships 5 headline capabilities (Managed EDR with 24/7 SOC, Microsoft 365 ITDR, Security awareness training, Ransomware canaries) and deploys Cloud. Arctic Wolf ships 5 (MDR with concierge team, Managed risk/vuln, 24/7 SOC, Log retention), deploying Cloud.

Ratings & verdict

Huntress holds 4.9/5 (700 G2 reviews); Arctic Wolf holds 4.7/5 (250 G2 reviews). On our data-weighted score, Huntress edges ahead (9.2 vs 8.5/10). Pick Arctic Wolf instead when mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team. See Huntress alternatives or Arctic Wolf alternatives.

Frequently asked questions

Arctic Wolf vs Huntress: which is better?
Arctic Wolf vs Huntress: on our data-weighted scoring, Huntress edges ahead (9.2 vs 8.5/10). Arctic Wolf starts at Custom quote and is best for mid-market orgs wanting a named concierge security team; Huntress starts at Custom quote and is best for msps and smbs wanting affordable managed detection with a real human soc.
Is Arctic Wolf cheaper than Huntress?
Arctic Wolf starts at Custom quote and Huntress starts at Custom quote (see the pricing rows for models and limits).
Data as of June 16, 2026. Sources: arcticwolf.com, huntress.com. Figures are pulled from public vendor and security data and refreshed automatically.